Legal Opinion

State v. Payne

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaiechild, J.

The question of the withdrawal of a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. A decision to grant or deny a motion for withdrawal will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is shown to have been an abuse of discretion.

Although at least one appellate court has upheld a grant of permission to withdraw a plea because of unanticipated consequences of a conviction, 2 we have found no case where such consequences rendered it an abuse of discretion to deny permission to withdraw.

We find no abuse of discretion in the present case. Appellant claims that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. La Fave v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Gordon v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. DowlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. KoernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Van Voorhis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Mueller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Creighbaum v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API