Legal Opinion

Mueller v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The two issues presented on this review are:

1. Where the plaintiff in error was represented by counsel at his trial, did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying the plaintiff in error’s post-conviction motion to withdraw his plea of guilty where the plaintiff in error testified he was not aware of the nature and seriousness of the offenses charged and was not informed on this matter by either the trial court or his lawyer?

2. Was plaintiff in error entitled to withdraw his plea of guilty as of right because his attorney also represented a codefendant?

Trial Courtis Discretion.

Ordinarily,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. LaniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. OldhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. KollerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. White v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API