Legal Opinion

DeVougas v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Although one of the defendant’s writs of error seeks a review of the judgment of conviction entered on February 19, 1964, DeVougas made no argument here that the judgment was erroneous. His entire argument goes to the refusal to permit him to withdraw his plea of guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty and, consequently, to grant a new trial, is not governed by sec. 958.06, Stats., but is a motion directed to the discretion of the court.

“The question of the withdrawal of a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. A decision to grant or deny…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Browne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Van Voorhis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. State v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API