Legal Opinion
Hendgen v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 9, 1992No. LUBA 92-038; CA A75291PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Clackamas County denied petitioner’s application for a determination that they enjoy a nonconforming use for two buildings on their property and for a change of the use. LUBA affirmed. Petitioners seek review, and we reverse.
We take the facts from LUBA’s opinion:
“The subject property consists of 267 acres and is zoned General Agricultural District (GAD), an exclusive farm use zone. Zoning was first applied to the subject real property on December 14,1967. Under the first zoning ordinance applied in 1967 and all subsequent zoning provisions applicable to the subject property, commercial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Warner v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clackamas County v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Hendgen v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Rhine v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001