Legal Opinion

Clackamas County v. Gay

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1995No. 91-11-217; CA A79263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiff Clackamas County and intervenors Gidley, Kunze and Linn1 brought this action under ORS 215.185, seeking to enjoin defendants from continuing commercial airport and parachuting operations in violation of county zoning regulations. Defendants interposed a number of defenses, the principal one being that their predecessors in title had established a nonconforming airport use before restrictive zoning was first enacted in 1967. The trial court found in the main in favor of plaintiff and intervenors and enjoined most of the operations about which they complained. However, it held that a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Clackamas County v. MarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Hendgen v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Warner v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Clackamas County v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Clackamas County v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API