Legal Opinion

Rhine v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. 92-106, 92-189; CA A78834PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Portland’s (city) decision that petitioner’s nonconforming use for the operation of a reprographics, blueprint and printing business had been discontinued for two years, beginning in May, 1987, and was therefore terminated under Portland City Code (PCC) 33.258.050.D.1 (ordinance):

“If the site of a nonconforming use is vacant for 2 continuous years, the nonconforming use rights are lost and the reestablishment of a nonconforming use is prohibited. If the site is vacant for less than 2 continuous years, the nonconforming use rights are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Beck v. City of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Village of Slinger v. Polk Properties, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API