Legal Opinion
Rhine v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 19, 1993No. 92-106, 92-189; CA A78834PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Portland’s (city) decision that petitioner’s nonconforming use for the operation of a reprographics, blueprint and printing business had been discontinued for two years, beginning in May, 1987, and was therefore terminated under Portland City Code (PCC) 33.258.050.D.1 (ordinance):
“If the site of a nonconforming use is vacant for 2 continuous years, the nonconforming use rights are lost and the reestablishment of a nonconforming use is prohibited. If the site is vacant for less than 2 continuous years, the nonconforming use rights are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Beck v. City of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Village of Slinger v. Polk Properties, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021