Legal Opinion

State v. Elmquist

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1992No. 13321PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLACK, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for shooting at an occupied building, in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-3-8 (Cum. Supp.1991). He contends the instructions given to the jury omitted an essential element of the crime because the instructions did not require that the jury find he knew or should have known the building was occupied at the time of the shooting. Under the instructions given, the jury had only to determine that he willfully discharged a firearm at the building, and that the building was occupied. Defendant argues that Section 30-3-8 proscribes shooting at a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. OroscoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Maestas Ex Rel. Estate of Varela v. ZagerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wilson v. DenverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Leo v. Cornucopia RestaurantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API