Legal Opinion

Leo v. Cornucopia Restaurant

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1994No. 14854PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

Employer and Insurer (Respondents) appeal, and Rogelio Leo (Claimant) cross-appeals, from a compensation order requiring Respondents to pay Claimant compensation for a permanent partial disability of 61%, and a later order directing that Claimant’s attorney fees be paid one-half by Claimant and one-half by Respondents.

Respondents contend in their appeal that the Workers’ Compensation Judge (Judge) erred as a matter of law in determining Claimant’s residual physical capacity under NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-26.4 (Repl.Pamp.1991) (effective January 1, 1991). In his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Adams v. Loffland Brothers Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Leonard v. Payday ProfessionalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Meyers v. Western Auto & CNA InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Blackwood & Nichols Co. v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API