Legal Opinion
State v. Orosco
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1992No. 19956, 19957 and 19999PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Justice.
The first two of these three cases were filed in this Court after the court of appeals issued its opinion in each defendant’s appeal from his district court convictions involving criminal sexual contact of a minor (CSCM) and certain other offenses. After both defendants had filed their briefs in the court of appeals, we held in State v. Osborne, 111 N.M. 654, 808 P.2d 624 (1991), that “unlawfulness” is an element of CSCM. In light of that decision, the court of appeals certified the first two cases to us, pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 34-5-14(C) (Repl.Pamp.1990),…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- State v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.