Legal Opinion

Maestas Ex Rel. Estate of Varela v. Zager

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2007No. 28,997PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAES, Justice.

{1} This appeal arises from a medical malpractice claim brought by Petitioner Petra Maestas, personal representative of the decedent, under the Tort Claims Act (TCA), NMSA 1978, §§ 41-4r-l to -27 (1976, as amended through 2006). The trial court granted a summary judgment motion in favor of Respondent Dr. Philip G. Zager after determining that Petitioner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations within the TCA, Section 41^-15(A) (1977). Petitioner appealed the granting of summary judgment to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed, holding that Section 41-4-15 is an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Roberts v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Williams v. StewartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Herrera v. City of EspanolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  4. Rathje v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API