Maestas Ex Rel. Estate of Varela v. Zager
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAES, Justice.
{1} This appeal arises from a medical malpractice claim brought by Petitioner Petra Maestas, personal representative of the decedent, under the Tort Claims Act (TCA), NMSA 1978, §§ 41-4r-l to -27 (1976, as amended through 2006). The trial court granted a summary judgment motion in favor of Respondent Dr. Philip G. Zager after determining that Petitioner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations within the TCA, Section 41^-15(A) (1977). Petitioner appealed the granting of summary judgment to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed, holding that Section 41-4-15 is an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Allen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Roberts v. Southwest Community Health ServicesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Williams v. StewartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Herrera v. City of EspanolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Rathje v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.