People v. Mitchell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not err in permitting cross-examination of defendant regarding a statement he made to police. Defense counsel objected on the ground that no CPL 710.30 notice had been served, but raised no objection upon the ground of voluntariness. Thus that issue was not properly preserved for our review (see, People v DeBlase, 142 AD2d 926; People v Balschweit, 91 AD2d 1127). Moreover, a CPL 710.30 notice was not required. The statement was not used as evidence-in-chief but was utilized on cross-examination and rebuttal solely to impeach…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BalschweitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SanzottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. BurksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. SpinksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. PruittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. KasparekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.