People v. Johnson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
It was error to have admitted, over timely and specific objection, the testimony of the victim’s companion explicitly bolstering, and the testimony of two police officers implicitly bolstering, the victim’s identification of defendant (People v Trowbridge, 305 NY 471). The People, acknowledging the error, argue that defendant’s conviction should be affirmed inasmuch as the error was harmless. We agree.
Harmless error analysis proceeds in two stages. First, “unless the proof of the defendant’s guilt, without…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. MobleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by269 opinions
- People v. HoltNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. McEathronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. Benjamin R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. KnowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.