People v. Kasparek

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that County Court abused its discretion in summarily denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized from his vehicle. Defendant signed a written consent to the search and did not contend that it was unlawful until more than 300 days had *971elapsed after his arraignment. No good cause was shown for his delay, and the motion was properly denied as untimely (see, People v Turner, 49 NY2d 925; People v Colon, 127 AD2d 678, affd 71 NY2d 410, cert denied 487 US 1239; People v Sturgis, 112 AD2d 757, lov denied 68 NY2d 817,…