Legal Opinion
Morse v. Crocker National Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1983No. Civ. 52029PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RACANELLI, P. J.
This appeal is taken from a judgment in favor of respondent and defendant Crocker National Bank (Crocker) on a supplemental com plaint, as amended, for rescission and damages brought by the remaindermen of an inter vivos trust established by Kathleen Mae Eitel, deceased, as an integral part of a property settlement agreement executed between decedent and her former spouse during a 1961 divorce proceeding. On appeal, the sole question to be decided is whether the action for rescission falls within the open limitation provisions of section 348 of the Code of Civil…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- King v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Copesky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hae Won Lee v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. Mullins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.