Copesky v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
This petition seeks review of the sustaining without leave to amend of a demurrer to one cause of action of petitioner’s complaint. The cause so terminated was entitled, and is properly characterized as, “Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.” By means of this cause of action the petitioner sought to recover tort damages because of the real party in interest bank’s wrongful cashing of checks drawn without proper signature. The allegations of the complaint were obviously drawn so as to bring the action within the rationale of this court’s decision…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Freeman & Mills, Inc. v. Belcher Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Morris v. Redwood Empire BancorpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.