Legal Opinion
Pomrenke v. Commissioner of Commerce
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 2004No. A03-497PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Relator Daniel Pomrenke challenges the Minnesota Department of Commerce’s (Department) order concluding that relator had submitted residential mortgage applications with false and misleading statements and altered title work, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 58.12, subd. l(b)(2)(i), (iv), (v) (2000) and Minn.Stat. § 58.13, subd. 1(9) (2000), and barring him from engaging in mortgage origination or servicing in the state. On appeal, relator argues: (1) the Department did not have jurisdiction to initiate disciplinary proceedings against him; (2) the Department’s order…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Obara v. Minnesota Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- TIMELINE, LLC v. Williams Holdings 3, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In the Matter of the Athlete Agent Application of Donald Walthal.lCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017