Legal Opinion
STATE TRIAL ATTORNEYS'ASSN v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1976No. Civ. 15561PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
In this action four civil service attorneys employed in the Legal Division of the State Department of Transporta tion (together with several representative organizations) seek salaiy parity with attorneys having equivalent positions in other state agencies. Their appeal requires analysis of Government Code section 18850, the statute which expresses the standards to be observed by the State Personnel Board in fixing civil service salaries. We hold that the State Personnel Board violates section 18850 when, in deference to “compaction” caused by statutory and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- California State Employees'assn. v. St. of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- California State Employees' Ass'n v. FlournoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- State v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Telish v. Cal. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees v. Civil Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.