Legal Opinion
Riley v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1924No. S. F. No. 10946PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondents as members of and constituting the Board of Pilot Commissioners for the ports of San Francisco, Mare Island, and Benicia to account to him as controller of the state of California for and to pay into the state treasury all moneys received by the respondents pursuant to section 2460 of the Political Code during the months of September, October, and November, 1923.
The respondent board was created by an act of the legislature approved March 22, 1870 (Stats. 1869-70, p. 344). In 1872 this act in all its essential respects was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- People Ex Rel. Einsfeld v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Riley v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.