Legal Opinion
Zimmerman v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1988No. B035356PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOSKY, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal of a June 16, 1988, trial court order which denied the motion of appellant Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated (Drexel) to compel arbitration and imposed $5,840 in sanctions on Drexel and its counsel, the law firm of Keesal, Young & Logan. The trial court found that the motion “was filed in bad faith and solely for the purpose of delay, based on counsel’s failure to file the motion earlier and contradictory statements under oath.”
Drexel filed a notice of appeal the next day. Its notice of appeal cites a new case, on which case the Keesal, Young…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,790 Rayford Price and Barbara Ashley Price v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. And George WilmotCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Christensen v. Dewor DevelopmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. BrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Davis v. Continental Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Roos v. Honeywell International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Computer Prepared Accounts, Inc. v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Town of Woodside v. GavaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.