Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Dewor Developments

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1983No. L.A. 31691PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN J.

We grapple here with a variation on a recurring and often vexing theme concerning waiver of the right to arbitrate. Specifically, we consider whether a party retains the right to insist upon arbitration after he has filed a lawsuit over admittedly arbitrable disputes, for the asserted purpose of discovering his opponent’s legal theories, and has pursued that litigation through successive demurrers, abandoning it only a day before a scheduled hearing on the adequacy of his amended complaint. While this court has in other contexts been reluctant to find waiver, partly in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Carcich v. Rederi A/B NordieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API