Christensen v. Dewor Developments
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN J.
We grapple here with a variation on a recurring and often vexing theme concerning waiver of the right to arbitrate. Specifically, we consider whether a party retains the right to insist upon arbitration after he has filed a lawsuit over admittedly arbitrable disputes, for the asserted purpose of discovering his opponent’s legal theories, and has pursued that litigation through successive demurrers, abandoning it only a day before a scheduled hearing on the adequacy of his amended complaint. While this court has in other contexts been reluctant to find waiver, partly in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Carcich v. Rederi A/B NordieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.