Legal Opinion
Jenkins v. Parker
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1981No. 80-1089PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a trial court order denying defendant-appellants’ motion for summary judgment on plaintiff-appellees’ complaint to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Appellants premise this court’s jurisdiction on D.C.Code 1973, § ll-721(a)(2)(C), contending that the trial court’s order is an interlocutory order “changing or affecting possession of property.” We disagree. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
I
Appellants, Robert K. and Sarah H. Jenkins, hired appellees, Patricia and Samuel Parker, Jr. (doing business as The Parker Group), to renovate their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chas. McCaul Co. v. HarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Laughlin v. BerensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Moyer v. MoyerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Clark v. DISTRICT DISCOUNT COMPANY, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Hankerson v. TillmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Methodist Church v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Morgan v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Frank Emmet Real Estate, Inc. v. MonroeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hagner Management Corp. v. LawsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Word v. HamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.