Legal Opinion
Frank Emmet Real Estate, Inc. v. Monroe
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 28, 1989No. 87-976PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from the granting of a motion to vacate a default judgment for possession of premises leased from appellant Frank Emmet Real Estate, Inc. (hereinafter “Landlord”). 1 The main issue before us deals with the adequacy of the service of process made on appellee. We affirm.
I
The facts, which are essentially undisputed, are as follows: Appellee Thomas Monroe entered into a lease with Landlord for premises located at 800 Randolph Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. He occupied the premises from January 1976 until August 1985, at which time he moved to Pueblo,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Malone v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jones v. HershDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Carrasco v. THOMAS D. WALSH, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ayers v. LandowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Edelhoff v. Shakespeare Theatre at the Folger Library, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.