Legal Opinion

Laughlin v. Berens

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 4, 1942No. 7974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from interlocutory orders of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia of May 8 and 9, 1941. The nature of these orders will appear more particularly below. The appeals are taken under D.C.Code (1940) § 17 — 101,1 providing that “Appeals shall ... be allowed to . [the] United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia from all interlocutory orders of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia . . . whereby the possession of property is changed or affected . . ..” It is necessary for an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. BerensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Chas. McCaul Co. v. HarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  3. Shaw v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  4. Shaw v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Mellon v. MertzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dameron v. Capitol House Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Hagner Management Corp. v. LawsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Jenkins v. ParkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Quick v. ParegolDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Taylor v. First American Title Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API