Legal Opinion

Hankerson v. Tillman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1952No. 1192PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The proceedings below consisted of a claim on a promissory note, counterclaim for money due and various motions. This appeal is from the action of the trial ' court in overruling a motion to vacate an order overruling a motion for summary judgment, overruling a motion to dismiss, overruling a motion for production of documents, and ordering plaintiff to file an answer to the counterclaim by a specified date. Obviously these are all interlocutory matters. No final judgment or order has been entered. This court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from interlocutory orders only when such orders…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harco, Inc. v. Greenville Steel and Foundry CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Meadis v. Atlantic Construction & Supply Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Jenkins v. ParkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Brenner v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Diamond Housing Corp. v. MunsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API