Legal Opinion
Word v. Ham
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 1985No. 84-900PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
The narrow issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that no genuine issues of material fact existed and that appellees were, therefore, entitled to judgment, as to liability, as a matter of law. We conclude it did and therefore reverse. 1
In September of 1974, appellants entered into an installment land sales contract to purchase from appellees a multi-family apartment complex. The pertinent provisions of the financial arrangements provided for monthly installment payments of $2,847.46 on the first deed of trust and $669.16 on a new purchase money note.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Goldkind v. Snider Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- McCoy v. Quadrangle Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dresser v. Sunderland Apartments Tenants Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cohen v. Owens & Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sacks v. RothbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Flippo Construction Co. v. Mike Parks Diving Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Dale Denton Real Estate, Inc. v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Han v. Southeast Academy of Scholastic Excellence Public Charter SchoolDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.