Scoville v. Anderson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Upon January 22, 1896, A. Anderson, defendant and appellant herein, commenced an action in the superior court of the county of Alameda against one William Schmidt to recover a money judgment. Thereafter, on the twenty-fourth day of January, at the hour of 12:30 P. M., he caused an attachment to he levied upon certain real estate of William Schmidt, a member of the copartnership of George F. Smith & Co., which real estate is situated in the city and county of San Francisco. At the hour of 4:20 P. M. of the twenty-fourth day of February, 1896, a petition was filed in the superior court of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Louisville v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- People ex rel. Campbell v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
- Price v. WhitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Miner v. Goodyear India-Rubber Glove Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Kahn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Shalabi v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Reichardt v. ReichardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Union Oil Co. v. DomengeauxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.