Legal Opinion

Louisville v. Savings Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 19, 1881No. 1005PublishedCited by 65 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of tbe United States for the Southern District of Illinois. This was an action brought by tbe Portsmouth Savings Bank against the township of Louisville, Clay County, Illinois, upon coupons detached from bonds issued Jan. 5,1871, by the supervisor and town cjerk to the Springfield and Illinois Southeastern Railway Company, which was formed in February, 1870, by the consolidation of the Illinois Southeastern Railway Compauy with the Pana,…

Read the full summary

Error to the Circuit Court of tbe United States for the Southern District of Illinois. This was an action brought by tbe Portsmouth Savings Bank against the township of Louisville, Clay County, Illinois, upon coupons detached from bonds issued Jan. 5,1871, by the supervisor and town cjerk to the Springfield and Illinois Southeastern Railway Company, which was formed in February, 1870, by the consolidation of the Illinois Southeastern Railway Compauy with the Pana, Springfield, and Northwestern Railroad Company. The bonds, fifteen in number, bear date April 1, 1870, and each recites that it “…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hablan

The bonds in question contain the same recitals as those of Harter Township in the same county, the validity of which was determined in Harter v. Hernochan, 108 U. S. 562. The same questions which arose on the validity, construction, and scope of the enactments under which they were issued, arid delivered to the consolidated company, are now presented for determination.. We perceive no reason for withdrawing or qualifying the conclusions we then announced.

There is, however, one question of some importance which did not then arise. It appeared in that case that the election held under the act…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. Fairfield v. County of GallatinSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Lapeyre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. People ex rel. Campbell v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
  5. In re RichardsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1843

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. State of RussiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. Leidigh Carriage Co. v. StengelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  4. Chandler v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API