Karnes v. Doctors Hospital
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
I
It is the contention of appellant that the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. In this regard, appellant maintains that there exist genuine issues of material fact regarding the nature of her employment relationship with appellee. The first two counts of appellant’s complaint contain allegations which propound a contractual theory of recovery. In essence, these allegations advance the view that the employee handbook at issue constituted an employment contract which was subsequently breached by appellee.
This construction of the legal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Talley v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local No. 377Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by61 opinions
- Leigh Cline v. Catholic Diocese of Toledo Catholic Diocesan School of Toledo St. Paul Elementary School Herbert J. Willman, Administrator St. Paul Elementary SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Russ v. TRW, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Hanly v. Riverside Methodist HospitalsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Cline v. Catholic Diocese of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.