Legal Opinion

Cline v. Catholic Diocese of Toledo

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2000No. 98-3527UnknownCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Leigh Cline (“Cline”) brought a pregnancy discrimination suit against Defendants-Appellees, Catholic Diocese of Toledo, et al., (“St.Paul”), under Title VII and Chapter 4112 of the Ohio Revised Code. She also asserted claims for breach of contract and promissory estop-pel. Cline appeals the summary judgment granted by the district court in favor of St. Paul on all four claims. For the following reasons, we reverse in part and affirm in part.

I

St. Paul Elementary and High School employed Leigh Cline as a teacher from June 1994…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Leigh Cline v. Catholic Diocese of Toledo Catholic Diocesan School of Toledo St. Paul Elementary School Herbert J. Willman, Administrator St. Paul Elementary SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Sharon MacY v. Hopkins County School Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Noble v. Brinker International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Peters v. Highland HillsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Alwan v. Rustic Gem, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API