Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*90Lundberg Stratton, J.
I. Introduction
{¶ 1} The primary question before the court is whether the breach of a promise to execute an agreement justifies using promissory estoppel to remove the agreement from the statute of frauds. Ancillary to this question is whether a joint agreement can impose fiduciary duties absent compliance with the statute of frauds. We answer both questions in the negative. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
II. Facts
{¶ 2} Appellant, ACE Capital Title Reinsurance Company (“ACE”), is a title reinsurance company located in New York. ACE is owned…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Talley v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local No. 377Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Karnes v. Doctors HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Prime Invests., L.L.C. v. Altimate Care, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. InksOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- A N Bros. Corp. v. Total Quality Logistics, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Schlaegel v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.