Legal Opinion

Talley v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local No. 377

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1976No. 76-538PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the Fund is estopped from denying payment on the certificate of coverage as described in the pamphlet. Appellant points out the terms of coverage resulted from the mistake on the part *144o£ the.' Fund, noting that neither the insured .nor his beneficiary contributed in any way to the mistake and that the insured died within the period of coverage.

Appellee argues that appellant is entitled to a $3,000 death benefit, and that the mistake in mailing the wrong pamphlet was at most a harmless error which does not estop.the Fund from denying payment under Plan VII coverage.'.

In-…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carucci v. John Hancock Mutl. Life Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. MuncyOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Karnes v. Doctors HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API