Legal Opinion

Jones v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1911No. Docket No. 16PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Case by Clarence Jones against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

The plaintiff, formerly a railroad engineer on the defendant’s railroad, was injured in a collision between his engine and a passenger train known as No. 8, running between Grand Rapids and Chicago. The collision occurred in defendant’s yard near Grand Rapids, known as “Wyoming yard.” Defendant’s track was a double main track, running southerly from Godfrey avenue or thereabouts at Grand Rapids through Wyoming yard to a point where the Lake Shore road crosses defend*3ant’s road. Beyond that it was a single track. A double-track main also existed on the Detroit branch, extending from Oakland to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Eastman v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Glover v. ScottenMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Fluhrer v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Enright v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GonyawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Fleegar v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. City of Detroit v. PorathMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Swank v. CroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. City of Kalamazoo v. Standard Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API