Hunn v. Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Jackson. (Peck, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
About 3 o'clock on the morning' of December 30, 1885, engine No. 120, with a way-car, under the charge of W. D. Loomis as conductor, and Samuel Maitland as engineer, and George Hunn as fireman, left Bay City, going south, with orders to run wild to Bives Junction, over the Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Bail-road, leased and operated by the defendant company. On the same morning engine No. 177, without any train, was proceeding north over the same road, under the charge of Nelson Napier as conductor, Bobert Mills, engineer, and Thomas Looney, fireman. Both engines were run under orders by…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Chicago & North Western Railroad v. SwettIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Hill v. Harbor Steel & Supply Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Richmond v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Gordon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Howard v. Beldenville Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.