Enright v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff’s decedent, James Enright, was *410in tbe employ of tbe defendant as freight conductor. On the night of the 27th of February, 1890, he was in charge of a freight train going south-easterly over its road. He had stopped his train on the main track at Ithaca. While it was standing there, early the next morning, and while it was dark, a freight train, going in the same direction, ran into it, and killed Mr. Enright. Plaintiff recovered verdict and judgment.
The negligence claimed is—
“That the train dispatcher directed Enright to stop his train, which was going south-easterly, at Ithaca, and…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Nolan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Little Rock & M. R. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Jones v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- McDonald v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.