Legal Opinion

Swank v. Croff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1929No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 33,998PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. There was judgment for plaintiff against defendant Croff and judgment for defendant Moote. Plaintiff brings error.

Defendant Croff, at the time the cause of action is said to have arisen, operated a dance hall in the vicinity of Ensley Center, Newaygo county. There had been disturbance there by reason of intoxication of frequenters of the place. On the night in question, when plaintiff was there, a deputy sheriff of Newaygo county was in attendance. On account of parties being drunk and disorderly, the deputy called…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Waller v. SloanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cook v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Steele v. City of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. O'Dell v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fleegar v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. City of Detroit v. PorathMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Snyder v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Dahlerup v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. In Re Estate of TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API