Legal Opinion

Brockbank v. Albion Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1905No. 1643PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Salt Lake County; W. C. Hall, Judge. Action by Joseph P. Brockbank against the Albion Alining Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, C. J.

This is an action to determine the adverse claim of the parties to the right of possession of certain mining ground situate in Little Cottonwood Mining District, Salt Lake county, Utah. The plaintiff claims to be the owner and entitled to the possession.of the Homestake No. 1 mining claim, which was located January 1, 1900. The defendant claims to be the owner and entitled to the possession of the Omega mining claim, located October 22, 1902, the Alice and Alice No. 1, both located January 2, 1903, and the Albion No. 8, located June 30, 1903. The area included within the boundaries of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
  2. North Noonday Mining Co. v. Orient Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
  3. McGinnis v. EgbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  4. Erwin v. PeregoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Conway v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bergquist v. West Virginia-Wyoming Copper Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Protective Mining Co. v. Forest City Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Campbell v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API