Conway v. Hart
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Reddy, Campbell & Metson, and J. J. Trabucco, for Appellant. J. W. Congdon, and William Bradford Bosley, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to recover possession of a part of a quartz mining claim called the “Belmont,” together with damages for certain alleged trespasses committed thereon by the defendant, and to obtain an injunction to prevent the defendant from taking rock and gold from said claim, and from interfering with it in any way. The case was tried by the court without a jury; the court found all the material issues in favor of the plaintiffs, for whom judgment was rendered, and defendant appeals from the judgment, a bill of exceptions being a part of the record. The plaintiffs made a location of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson v. RobySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bergquist v. West Virginia-Wyoming Copper Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1910
- Worthen v. SidwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Dwinnell v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McMillen v. Ferrum Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Brockbank v. Albion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.