Legal Opinion

Protective Mining Co. v. Forest City Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1909No. 7621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner J., entered March 26, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— In the year 1901 defendant’s grantor filed location notices covering three mining claims, in Skagit county. In June, 1907, one Cleveland, acting as agent for the plaintiff, filed location notices upon the same property. Plaintiff brought action against defendant to quiet its right of possession to the mining ground, alleging its location, that it had failed and neglected to perform its assessment work for the years 1906 and 1907, that it had forfeited all its rights in and to the property, that its claim of ownership was hostile and adverse to plaintiff; and praying for judgment that its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
  2. Nevada Sierra Oil Co. v. Home Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  3. Erwin v. PeregoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Cedar Canyon Consolidated Mining Co. v. YarwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Brockbank v. Albion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Milling & Mining Co. v. PiccoloWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Dickens-West Mining Co. v. Crescent Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Olympic Manganese Mining Co. v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API