Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Nagler
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided October 9, 1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. Shapiro, J.
The answering defendants move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to section 91 of the New York City Municipal Court Code and rule 112 of the Buies of Civil Practice, or in the alternative for leave to amend their answer by adding a separate and complete defense alleging that this court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action.
On a motion for judgment on the pleadings, affidavits cannot be considered except under very limited circumstances not shown to exist here (Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co., 256 App. Div. 840; Drimmer v. Band McNally & Co., 111 N. Y. S. 2d 902, 905;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. CoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Husted v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Van Camp v. . SearleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Ramsey v. RamseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Durham v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kathryn Strom v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. And Goldman, Sachs & Co. Supplemental Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Kaminsky v. ConnollyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972
- Hellman v. PlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Boyd v. CurranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Milberg v. NaglerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.