Legal Opinion

Kaminsky v. Connolly

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 29, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The Civil Court, which has no general equity jurisdiction except as specifically provided by statute, does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of an action against the trustees of a pension fund to recover pension benefits, requiring in the first instance a declaration that plaintiff is a beneficiary of the trust and enforcing his rights as a beneficiary thereof, relief of an equitable nature which can be had only in a court possessing equitable jurisdiction (Milberg v. Nagler, 17 Misc 2d 893 [App. Term, 2d Dept.], mot. for lv. to app. den. 7 A D 2d 1010; Hoffman v. Nagler, 206 Misc.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. NaglerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
  2. Milberg v. NaglerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hellman v. PlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Garfinkle v. KaplanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
  3. Kaufman v. CBS Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  4. Mallardi v. District Council 37 Health & Security Plan TrustCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  5. Simmons v. SimmonsCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API