Legal Opinion

Milberg v. Nagler

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 3, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A trust was created by the provisions establishing the retirement fund, contained in the collective agreement dated June 28,1943 upon which plaintiff relies. A consideration in determining whether a trust has been created is the intention of the parties (1 Scott, Trusts [2d ed.], § 12.2). In the instant case a reading of the provisions of the 1943 agreement, relating to establishment of the retirement fund, makes manifest that the creation of a trust was intended. The fund established by the said agreement was a distinct fund, consisting of employers ’ contributions paid over to the members…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Husted v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Hoffman v. NaglerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
  3. Durham v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Petrides v. Park Hill Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  5. Batchis v. LeaskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaminsky v. ConnollyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1972
  2. Hellman v. PlossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Society of New York Hospital v. MalskyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API