Legal Opinion

Columbian Laundry v. Hencken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greenbaum, J.:

The action was brought to recover from defendant money alleged to have been obtained by him from plaintiff upon false representations.

After plaintiff’s counsel had opened the case before the jury, defendant’s counsel moved upon the pleadings and the opening to dismiss the complaint. The motion was thereafter granted.

The facts upon which the plaintiff relied in support of its cause of action as gleaned from the allegations of the complaint and opening of counsel will be briefly stated. It appears from the opening that a concern named Greenhut & Co. was winding up its business and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
  2. Baldwin v. . BurrowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Post v. KimberlyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
  4. Chase v. BarrettNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
  5. Porter v. M'Clure & TourtellotNew York Supreme Court · 1836

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Hasday v. BarocasNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Flammia v. Mite CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  5. George W. Haxton & Son, Inc. v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API