Legal Opinion
Hasday v. Barocas
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1952PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin J. Rabin, J.
This is an action for an accounting with respect to an alleged joint venture between the parties.
Some time in January, 1945, the plaintiff Charles Hasday, acting for himself, the plaintiff Bardavid, and his brother Mordu, then in the business of manufacturing house dresses as partners under the name of Dixie Dress Co. (hereinafter referred to as “ Dixie”), and the defendant Morris Barocas, acting for the defendants, then separately engaged in the manufacture of house dresses, purchased the controlling interest in Mansfield Mills (hereinafter referred to as “ Mansfield ”), a North Carolina…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Newton v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Schantz v. . OakmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Green v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Securities Groups v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Steinbeck v. GerosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.