Legal Opinion

George W. Haxton & Son, Inc. v. Rich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1944PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbewsteb, J.

Action No. 1 is in replevin for 9,500 pounds of red kidney beans. It was begun in the County Court of Cortland County. Action No. 2 is for the recovery of damages for the conversion of said beans. Thereafter by order Action No. 1 was removed from the County Court to the Supreme Court and consolidated with Action No. 2. They were tried by the court, without a jury. Separate decisions and judgments were made and entered. In Action No. 1 the complaint was dismissed with costs to defendant Bowker as against the plaintiff George W. Haxton & Son, Inc. In Action No. 2 plaintiff Bowker was awarded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Ross v. WillettNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wilcox v. PrattNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Spier v. HydeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Brown v. LeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Credit Francais International, S. A. v. Sociedad Financiera de Comercio, C. A.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Fallone v. Misericordia HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Hasday v. BarocasNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Backus Plywood Corporation v. Commercial Decal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API