Legal Opinion
Flammia v. Mite Corporation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 6, 1975No. 73 Civ. 1571PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PLATT, District Judge.
Statement of Facts
Plaintiff seeks compensation for services allegedly performed for the defendants, Mite Corporation (“Mite”) and O. S. G. Tap and Die, Inc. (“O. S. G.”), in connection with the purchase by O. S. G. of a Mite subsidiary, the Sossner Tap & Tool Corporation (“Sossner”). The demand for such services is $200,000 (an amount equivalent to 10% of the purchase price). Plaintiff in his complaint asked in state court for remuneration on the basis of implied contract and quantum meruit. The action was removed to this Court on diversity grounds.
Both defendants…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Crabtree v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Steinbeck v. GerosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Precision Testing Laboratories, Ltd. v. Kenyon Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Orderline Wholesale Distributors, Inc. v. Gibbons, Green, Van Amerongen, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- United Nuclear Corp. v. Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Marina Management Corp. v. John D. Brewer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.