Legal Opinion

People v. West

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1939No. Crim. 3208PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

By respective counts in an information filed against him, appellant was accused jointly with one Robert K. 'West of two charges of forgery and one charge of grand theft. Appellant admitted the commission of two prior felonies, as alleged in the information, and also admitted the service of penitentiary sentences therefor. Following a jury trial resulting in the conviction of both defendants on all counts and the pronouncement of judgment, defendant Rinehart alone prosecutes this appeal.

Epitomizing the facts most favorable to the prosecution, as we are required to do when the verdict is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Prople v. Le RoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. McGillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. WeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. Masato KarumaiUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  5. People v. BastioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API