People v. McGill

Prom each of two judgments of conviction of the crime of grand theft and one judgment of conviction of the crime of forgery that were rendered against him, as well as from an order by which his motion for new trial was denied, appellant has appealed to this court.

The principal point presented by appellant as affording a sufficient reason for an order by this court whereby said judgments would be reversed and the order for new trial would be granted,' is that, although the offenses of which defendant was convicted were committed within this state in 1928, the complaint that supplied the…