Legal Opinion

People v. Bastio

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1942No. Crim. 1810PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of a violation of section 288 of the Penal Code of California, after trial by the court. Appellant makes two contentions, one, that the evidence is insufficient to show that the Superior Court of Sacramento County had jurisdiction of the offense, and, two, that appellant did not lawfully consent to waiver of trial by jury.

The facts of the case are as follows: Defendant was on terms of intimacy with one Rose Gonzales, who lived at 1221 G Street, Sacramento, with her two small daughters, Gladys, aged 8 years, and Gloria, aged 10 years. Rose…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. TossettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Johnston v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. De SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. NolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. People v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Carrion v. GonzalezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1954
  5. Pueblo v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API