Legal Opinion

Davis v. Durham Mental Health Developmental Disabilities Substance Abuse Area Authority

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided June 1, 2004No. 1:03 CV 273PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

OSTEEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Carolyn Davis, a former employee at the Durham Mental Health Developmental Disabilities Substance Abuse Area Authority (“the Durham Center”), has sued the Durham Center and other defendants, alleging race and color discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”); age discrimination and retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.; a violation of Plaintiffs First Amendment…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Efird v. RileyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  2. Googerdy v. North Carolina Agricultural & Technical State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  3. Jackson v. Blue Dolphin Communications of North Carolina, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Ashton v. City of Concord, North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  5. Peterson v. Davidson County Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API