Legal Opinion

Griffeth v. Watts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1975No. 7426SC834PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

We believe that the directed verdict was improperly granted. In determining whether a motion for directed verdict should be granted, the test to be applied is whether the evidence, without weighing the credibility of the witnesses or otherwise considering the weight of the evidence, affords but one conclusion as to the verdict that reasonable men could have reached. See generally Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.E. 2d 297; Louis, A Survey of Decisions Under The New North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, 50 N.C. L. Rev. 729 (1972). In applying this test, it is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Clark v. ScheldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Racine v. BoegeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Woodard v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mouzon v. MOORE AND STEWART, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Campbell v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Campbell v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Daniel John Griggs v. Nancy J. SchrammCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API